Forsvarets Forskningsdatabase

Engelsk

Victim of its own success: How NATO’s difficulties are caused by the absence of a unifying existential threat

Projekt

NATO is neither in deep trouble nor destined to fall apart. The ‘NATO-in-crisis perspective’, which has gained currency in recent years, correctly identifies three centrifugal forces that threaten to undermine the Alliance: strategic divergence, a declining ability to act militarily, and fading public support. These problems are partly of NATO’s own making because they stem from the creation of a generally benign security environment devoid of clear and present existential threats. While the absence of a clear, unifying existential threat has made it impossible for the Alliance to agree on a common core purpose, this does not mean that NATO will fall apart. The three centrifugal forces identified by the NATO-in-crisis perspective is trumped by three centripetal that will continue to keep it together: converging national security interests, a strong sense of community and U.S. leadership.
Samarbejde med Jens Ringsmose, IMO

Afrapporting:

Forskning: Niveau 2 peer view tidsskrift: Journal of Transatlantic Studies 2018
FAK BFI: 6 points

Formidling: forskningsresultaterne vil løbende blive formidlet i til medier og den brede offentlighed i forskellige former som medieinterviews, aviskronikker, policy briefs, artikler i Ræson og lignende udgivelser

Undervisning: resultaterne vil blive anvendt i strategifagene på Master i Militære Studier og diplomuddannelserne
StatusIgangværende
Periode03/03/201401/03/2018
Log ind i Pure